Bohemian Grove and the New World Order. Their symbol is the wise owl Mo- Loch read to the left about its meaning and directly below is a map of Washington DC with the Bohemian owl imbedded into it’s town planning. Even on their dollar bill is the owl. This has been a freemason plan for more than 300 years. So Who do you think owns America?

There are many societies with different names but all still under the same umbrella. The Carlyle group, Freemasons etc. The White House is in the middle of the owl!

All so called GOVERNMENTS are in fact CORPORATIONS that are registered on the U.S Securities and Exchange Commissions web site. I give you two examples below one for AUSTRALIA the other for NEW ZEALAND. This means NO GOVERNMENT has the right to impose the laws they have created on you a living entity because corporate law is UCC: Uniform Commercial Code. Most courts work on admiralty law the laws of the sea and they deal with only contract law. You need to read about your STRAWMAN below.

You need to really stand up for your rights and take back what is rightfully yours.

See AUSTRALIA and NEW ZEALAND are registered Companies so who do you really think is behind the true direction of your country/corporation. Do you think the prime minister is really in charge? NO WAY just another puppet.

Why do the Catholics worship an upside-down Cross? That cross means they denounce Jesus as their savior which is the opposite to what they teach the poor SHEEPLE that fund them.

Why would JFK’s own driver shoot him?

Something to do with not signing over money to fight a very unpopular war.

Who would be behind something like that?

Maybe you should ask who was the director of the CIA at that time? 

Don’t fall down the SHEEPLE pit like lambs to the slaughter.

The Law of the UCC: Uniform Commercial Code

Around 1930 the time of the great depression most governments of the world were bankrupt and as payments to Bankers the governments floated a bond against our future earnings by using our birth registrations as the collateral for our promise to pay Income tax is just their having educated you to pay the interest on the loan YOU lent THEM. When we access our Direct Treasury Accounts, those held at the BC/ FRB under our SINs/ SSNs, we will no longer have to work.

 This Video is 11 Mb and please take the 6 minutes to look at it.

English and the Language of Law.  The English language and its accepted rules of grammar are likewise precise, however,  and make no accommodation for proper nouns to be written in all-capital letters. The all-capital letters-written name which appears on your IRD [Inland Revenue Department] Statements, driver's license, passport, bank statement, credit cards, etc., and which is rigidly enforced by the legal system, is not there by mistake - as the law is very precise. But it is not your "True Name," which appears with only initial letters capitalized. The all-caps version is the name of your mirror image straw man and is written in another language: "Legalese." The primary pitfall is that an all-capital letters name sounds exactly like a true name when spoken). This phenomenon has no particular significance in our society - except in a courtroom, and a courtroom can be a dangerous place. Simple observation tells us that a primary function of today's private, foreign-owned and operated court system is the transfer of personal wealth and freedom over to the banks and government. The judge is calling out a name in one language, "Legalese," (he is reading from the legal documents in front of him), and you are innocently listening and answering in another, "English." This otherwise harmless overlap of "language" is then immediately applied to your profound detriment. Such deception is now indispensable in maintaining the current level of commercial success of the courts (e.g. visit any "traffic court" for an hour and keep a tally of the proceeds). An all-capital letters-written name is an artificial construction and designates an artificial person existing only by force of or in contemplation of law. The problem enters in when a man or woman mistakenly believes that such a corruption of their true name refers to them - a calamitous case of mistaken identity. However, all  law-to be "law" - must offer remedy and recourse.

Elizabeth, of the family of Windsor is not the Monarchy of Canada or New Zealand. HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH II is a CORPORATION just like any other fiction. It is unfortunate, not to mention treasonous, that all our politicians have sworn an oath to this foreign entity. Equally absurd is that Elizabeth, in her Coronation, swore to uphold the Laws of God. What laws might those have been? I’d like to hear her list them. There is none. Politicians oaths of allegiance to the Queen are fraud and high treason. Read this PDF about freeing yourself from dept

http://www.scribd.com/doc/3931002/Wizard-of-OZ-Strawman They have been trying to tell you for years but sheeple just don’t think for themselves.

If we capture our Strawman by recording with the public its name via a Financing Statement – the one contract in the world which can’t be broken – (UCC-1 / PPSA  go to your Secretary of State web site / ppsa.ca) in both our birth and domicile states/provinces we thereby claim it as our debtor. It is no longer subject to the feds; it is now under our control. We can also claim our birth certificate, which is the original title to the Strawman and so discharge and hence release us, the living souls, from any debt, liability, or obligation of the Strawman. All these debts exist only on paper, in a digital venue, in computers, in a fictional commercial world. They are not real, although the bankers would have us think so. Now, the property of the living soul is tax exempt and free from any levy. Look at your birth certificate and you will notice that the Registration € date i.e. the birth of the strawman, is about two weeks after your alleged birth. You can’t be certain of the date of your birth because you do not have firsthand knowledge of it unless you personally documented it the day you were born...

Some of this information only relates to the USA but there is a section below that relates to New Zealand so called LAW. For people who live in Australia UPMART is a human rights and civil liberties association dedicated to the education and empowerment of the people of their rights and liberties For further information about UPMART please visit:

                           www.upmart.org   http://insights2.org/nesara/Oz.html  http://www.redemptionservice.com/contents/wizard_of_oz.asp

                                                                 http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=61516

Once one understands the true legal history of the "STRAW MAN," it is possible to tackle him head on.

New Zealand's Inland Revenue Code As you will discover, the Inland Revenue tax file number is a "public" number belonging to a "public person," a "person," a legal entity different from yourself and artificial as well; i.e. existing in contemplation of or by force of law alone. This is your alter ego, all-capital letters-written-name straw man. "STRAW MAN" is a legal term for a "front man," or nominal party to a transaction, existing in name only, which allows the owner to accomplish some purpose not otherwise permitted.

Owner, Slave and Master, A straw man serves its owner/master with slavish devotion, but the vast majority of you  do not even know that you have one. If you lack this key perception, you may assume you are his owner, but you will never be the master! [Herein lies the CONCEPT that will free you of worry and personal liability in operating virtual corporations in Cyberspace. OWNERSHIP is passé in the new age of digital laissez-faire capitalism. USE is the  new' key perception' - as use pre-empts ownership. - RRR] He has been running around obligating you and entering into all kinds of unconscionable contracts and causing you much grief, heartache, and economic misery. It is time you get to know this fellow and set things straight. Most people understand that the law is very precise, with legalized deadly violence attached to the words appearing in the text of the codes that are enforced by both courts and police.

The Code is the Law. The private forum of the UCC (Uniform Commercial Code) offers such a remedy. This is not intended to be a cure-all for legal woes and does not pretend to be anything other than a work-in-progress for legal self-discovery. For thousands of years the Powers That Be have been steadfastly constructing the System by which world law and commerce operate. They have developed their system utilizing timeless principles of human interaction which, over the millennia, have been discovered and codified. These fundamental, commonsense principles underlie every form of law extant on the planet. Every legal issue and dispute deals with one or more of these principles. Since all human interchange is commerce, in order to rule people it is necessary only to govern the commerce by which they interact and subsist. Those operating the system have achieved their pre-eminence by knowing the foundational principles and encrypting them into "codes" for their own benefit, while confusing the masses and keeping them ignorant of such real law and how to employ it correctly. The pinnacle of their efforts to date is the UCC (Uniform Commercial Code). Commerce now functions under, and is securely entrenched in, the UCC. The important points to remember are that while the UCC was formulated for purposes of exploitation and subjugation, it is a particular codification of the universal underlying laws of commerce, and, perhaps most importantly, can be employed for our benefit now that the code has been "cracked."

Protocols within the Code -The foundational maxims of the underlying commercial law, from which all law and commerce in the world today derive, are:

1) A workman is worthy of his hire.

2) All are equal under the law (moral and natural law).

3) In commerce truth is sovereign.

4) Truth is expressed in the form of an affidavit.

5) An unrebutted claim, charge, or affidavit stands as the truth in commerce.

6) An unrebutted affidavit becomes the judgment in commerce.

7) All matters must be expressed to be resolved

8) He who leaves the field of battle first loses by default.

9) Sacrifice is the measure of credibility (one who has not been damaged by, given to, lost on account of, or put at risk by another has no basis to       make claims or charges against him/her).

10) A lien or claim can be satisfied only through rebuttal by counter affidavit point-for-point, resolution by jury, or payment. The reason, this scenario prevails is because the world has been set up to run precisely this way. We (the slaves) were just not supposed to figure it out.

Code is Set in Stone -  Before the bankruptcy of the established nation states, [invocation of a debt-based system of finance], men and women sovereigns were personally accountable for their actions in courts that were set up to accommodate disputes among sovereigns (such as the original common law in England before 1066). Now, the people's straw men, which are legally owned property of the system, are the "accountable parties" as adjudicated and enforced by the system. Such formerly sovereign men and women are now personally accountable because they are inextricably joined with their straw men which is owned via implied contract by a handful of arch-charlatans.  Courts today are set up to deal only with straw men. We, their unfortunate counterparts, are merely "along for the ride." A sovereign (real being) has no place in a contemporary court (commercial, dealing in artificial persons), and cannot be legally accommodated. Only if the current debt-based system of finance and government is rectified will we ever get back to a sane and just basis for resolution of disputes and a sound civilization.

Your Moral Code is Primary - As a great Indian sage stated the matter: "Seek the highest first." This means, inter alia, to maintain your integrity and ethical behavior. In practice this requires that you keep your word, honor your contracts, and not depart from your principles. A fundamental flaw in Man's thinking is the notion that he can cheat moral or natural law (usually by trying to cheat others) and get away with it. Every such attempt generates inexorable cause/effect consequences, all man's philosophies, systems, and cleverness to the contrary notwithstanding. The entirety of our predicament is due to failure to live in harmony and accord with moral and natural law. The current system is the cause/effect result of our own folly. All governments are expressions of, and exist by virtue of, the people's irresponsibility, ignorance, laziness, larceny, and surrender of personal power, freedom, and autonomy in exchange for "being taken care of." In other words, every government exists due to the express will, as well as implied default of, the people (combined with the willingness of the ruthless to accept and manage the surrender of the people's power to the fictitious, artificially created, "government"). As Joseph de Maistre noted: "Every country gets the government it deserves."

What Can People Do? -To start with you must declare that you and your strawman are not one and the same. This is done via a very carefully worded affidavit, a "Statutory Declaration of True Name". This affidavit states exactly what your correct name is and that you are not to be confused with or represent in any way any of the straw man versions of your name. Next you will actually create an entity that takes on the names of your strawman. That is to say you will literally bring your straw man to life. Your strawman will be an entity officially created under New Zealand law having it's own legal status. The benefit is that you will not have to try and convince anyone that you are not one and the same as your strawman. It will be self-evident. The strawman will have it's own director and owner. The director and owner will represent the entity in all matters. The place for service and official address will be the same as the man or woman the entity is created to protect.

For example: Mr. John Frank Doe and Mrs. Jane Mary Doe of 22 New Street, Newmarket, Auckland, wish to protect themselves. This is what they do:        Mrs Jane Mary Doe forms a company called JOHN FRANK DOE LIMITED to protect her husband. She then registers several names as "doing business as" these are the entities' registered trademark - names, registered at the Companies Office. She registers: JOHN F. DOE, JOHN FRANK DOE, J. F. DOE, JOHN DOE, John Frank DOE, John F. Doe, J. F. Doe, John Doe, DOE John Frank.

Mrs Doe registers 22 New Street, Newmarket, Auckland as the place for  service etc.. The newly formed entity will conduct no business at all! It will have no IRD [Inland Revenue Department] number and no bank account. It will essentially be a shelf company that exists in name only to prove legally that the entity exists and that John Frank Doe is not that entity. Mr Doe will do the same for Mrs Doe.

Key Legal Perception- You do not want to own or direct a company that looks like your own name as that would serve to defeat the purpose. The reason the entity is formed is so that you are able to simply distinguish between yourself, the living man or woman, and the entity created by government to control you. After reading this material, understanding its implications and applying it correctly you will be in a commanding position against prosecution in admiralty court. As previously stated the courts can now only deal with the entities that governments create. The entity that sounds like your name does no business thus having a rock solid defense in any situation.

                                                             For more information please visit this website please.

If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State. - Joseph Goebbels (29 October 1897 – 1 May 1945) was a German politician and Reich Minister of Propaganda in Nazi Germany from 1933 to 1945. He was one of German dictator Adolf Hitler's closest associates and most devout followers.

                               How to deal with the police.

Victoria Police Code of Ethics: “I uphold the right in my role within the Victoria Police Force by acting impartially, with integrity and by providing service excellence to everyone.”

Every police officer is required to swear an oath or make an affirmation to serve the Crown (Queen), uphold the Constitution and the rights of the people. Remind them of the fact of their oath.

You could also state Victoria Police has a legal contract and is in service of the multinational weapons manufacturer, Lockheed Martin.  This is an unconscionable conflict of interest for Victoria Police and the State to be involved in corporate profiteering with a multinational weapons manufacturer.

Ask the police officer if it’s ethical and a conflict of interest for him to represent the corporations registered as VICTORIA POLICE, the STATE OF VICTORIA and LOCKHEED MARTIN, and also the people of Victoria he has sworn an oath to serve and protect. If he or she says it’s not a conflict of interest ask them to explain why it’s not a conflict of interest and for factual proof of their assertion.

Responding to Police Questioning

It is in your best interest to NEVER admit or confess to anything the police may allege or accuse you of. Challenge, question, dispute and disagree with any accusation, allegation, assumption or claim made against you. At law you are “presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt” in a court of competent jurisdiction!

Always maintain a calm, respectful and polite attitude at all times. Control your emotions. Never become angry, abusive, sarcastic and threatening because it may give a police officer a reasonable ground and valid cause of action to arrest you. Always remain honorable, confident, positive, and maintain eye contact. Be aware of your body language.

Always be aware at all times what you say and do as the police officer may be audio recording the conversation, and will likely be taking notes to use as possible evidence against you in court if they decide to charge and summon you.

Police are trained to use ACCUSATIONS, ALLEGATIONS, and ASSUMPTIONS to test, interrogate, intimidate and deceive a person if necessary to either determine the truth or gather evidence. A police officer is only legally permitted to make an accusation or allegation that you have committed some type of criminal offence, and then must either decide to set you free or charge and summon you to a court for a hearing or trial. However they have no jurisdiction to act as a judicial authority, i.e. magistrate or judge. The police must operate according to the legal principle and right of “every suspect is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt” in a court of competent jurisdiction.

The people’s political and civil rights are established in law, precedent and codified in the Magna Charta 1215, Habeus Corpus Act, Bill of Rights 1688 incorporated within the Imperial Acts Application Act 1922 and 1980,The Crimes Act 1958 (VIC),Sect. 51(24) of the Federal Australian Constitution, and Bible codified Common law.

Think before you speak and choose your words carefully! Only answer the question being asked if you believe it is a fair and reasonable question. Do not offer or volunteer any more information than asked for or absolutely necessary. The less said the better so say as little as possible. Remember - anything you say can and will be used against you as evidence, and the police may be audio recording the conversation and/or taking notes!

Stand your ground! If police accuse or allege anything deny it. Their accusations are only allegations. If a police officer makes an allegation or assumption refute it by saying: “I dispute / disagree / negate / oppose your accusation / allegation / assumption / opinion.”

You can follow this negation with a relevant question that places the burden of proof on them: “What facts are there proving your allegation, assumption etc. that I have committed an offence?” or “Who is the injured human-being in this alleged offence?” or “What property have I caused damaged to?”

You can also say “I do not wish to comment at this time until I have obtained legal advice.” You do have the right to remain silent. It is a primary defensive natural law, common law and human right and freedom.

Giving Personal Details

TheCrimes Act 1958(Sect. 456AA), states that you can be required to give the police ONLY your name and address, but NOT your date of birth, age, type of work or anything else. Pursuant to this Act you may give your address as your residential or work address. Any other personal and private information demanded is irrelevant and none of their business.

Consent & Jurisdiction

The principles of consent and jurisdiction are very important within a legal perspective. The police cannot lawfully touch you or threaten to touch you for the purpose of arrest without your informed consent. Neither are they lawfully entitled to search your body or enter your property, including your vehicle, without your consent or a valid court warrant. Otherwise you can make a criminal complaint and/or a civil claim for damages against an individual police officer for relevant criminal offences under theCrimes Act 1958 (VIC) or Criminal Code Act 1995 (Commonwealth) or Crimes Act 1914 (Commonwealth) including:

Assault.

Assault and battery.

Trespass.

Intimidation.

Harassment.

Threats with menace.

Misconduct in a public office.

False/unlawful arrest.

Deprivation of liberty.

False/unlawful imprisonment.

Enslavement

Coercion.

Armed kidnapping (based on false/unlawful arrest whilst in the possession of a firearm).

Violation of a political, civil or human right and liberty.

Denial of natural justice and abuse of rights.

9.4 Fines

The issuing of a fine is an assumption of guilt. No police officer and/or government authority/department/agency/body has any constitutional authority or power to impose fines.  Only the judicature pursuant to section 71 of the federal constitution, and the Imperial Acts Application Act 1922 & 1980 may impose a fine.

Second any fine imposed by a court MUST be done only after a natural person is “found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt" and convicted of an actual offence, AND the fine must be accompanied by a valid COURT ORDER with a PUBLIC SEAL of the court, under section 78 of the Evidence Act 1958, AND a supporting Affidavit.

Whenever a police officer and/or government authority/department/agency/body issues a fine and demands payment without FACTUAL PROOF of an actual offence against the LIFE, LIBERTY or PROPERTY of a human-being, they are actually committing EXTORTION, FRAUD and COERCION.

Also as the police officer is representing a State registered as a corporation, the State is an ARTIFICIAL PERSON/ENTITY that cannot be injured or harmed, and therefore has NO STANDING to fine or make a claim or complaint against anyone!  Only a living flesh and blood human-being has the right and standing to make a charge, claim or complaint against another living man and woman - NOT ARTIFICIAL DEAD ENTITIES!

The same principles apply to speeding fines but that does not mean a man or woman can drive a motor vehicle irresponsibly.  Every driver has a DUTY OF CARE obligation to not cause injury, harm, damage or loss to another natural person and their property through negligence, recklessness or omission to take care.  It can be argued that a man or woman in control of a motor vehicle may justify traveling over the posted speed limit by a certain number of kilometers per hour - usually no more than 10% - before it might be reasoned that the speed is excessive and unreasonable.

NOTE:

It is in your best interest and strongly advised that whenever you are interacting with police or any government authority, use an audio recording device for the purpose of gathering evidence for self defence against any charges, allegations, claims or complaints that may be made against you in future.

You have a primary natural law, common law and human right to record your own voice in any matter pertaining to your personal affairs, and it will keep the police and/or government authority wary and respectful of your rights.

KNOW YOUR POLITICAL & CIVIL RIGHTS & LIBERTIES

Every human-being is sovereign. You are a sovereign man or woman first and foremost.

Asovereign human is defined as a natural flesh and blood sentient man or woman who has “supreme authority or jurisdiction within themselves, independent of any outside authority/jurisdiction.” In essence sovereignty means the right of self-determination or self-government.

Asovereign human is with an unalienable natural law, divine law,common law/indigenous law and human right and liberty (freedom) of self determination,freedom of conscience,free will and freedom of choice in how they live their individual lives.

Asovereign human’s primary duty of care and obligation is a moral and/or ethical one not to intentionally or negligently cause injury, harm, damage or loss to another sovereign human’s life, liberty or property. No sovereign human has a right to impose their conscience and will over another sovereign human without their voluntary consent or agreement.

Everysovereign human is with the following unalienable natural law, divine law,common law/indigenous law and human rights and liberties:

5.1 My right to not consent(dissent) against any laws that I as a sovereign elector judge as deficient, unjust, or repugnant to my good conscience, or conflict with my natural law, divine law (bible codified law), common law, indigenous law or constitutional rights and liberties.

5.2 My right and liberty of political sovereignty and political liberty pursuant to the Preamble, Covering Clauses and section 51:35 of the Federal Australian Constitution.

5.3 My right and duty of objection and peaceful political protest against any deficient, repugnant, unjust, or unconscionable laws my elected political representatives and agents may create on my behalf. My right of peaceful political protest is recognised at law withinMagna Carta 1297 the Imperial Acts Application Act 1922 & 1980 (VIC);Bill of Rights 1688;Section 51:35 of the Federal Australian Constitution, and section 28 of the Federal Crimes Act 1914.

5.4 My right ofconscientious objection against any laws that conflict with, or are repugnant to my good conscience pursuant to natural law,divine law (Bible codified law) and Section 116 of the Federal Australian Constitution.Section 116 recognizes the existence of God, the right of conscientious objection, conscientious belief and the right to conviction of one’s spirit and beliefs.

5.5 My right of self-defence against any laws that may cause me injury, harm, damage or loss, and/or to protect and defend my interests, and/or are not in the best interests of my community.

5.6 My right of freedom of communication and expression on any matter which affects my life and interests.

5.7 My right of freedom of communication on government and political matters pursuant to the High Court judgment of Levy vs State of Victoria (1997) and an implied Federal Constitutional right (s.51:35).

REMEMBER:

You have an absolute God given unalienable natural law, divine law, common law and human right to

DISSENT, DISOBEY and DEFY any law you do not accept or agree with IF you reasonably believe that law may cause you injury, harm, damage or loss in any way OR is not in your or the community’s highest or best interests.

This is your right and duty of CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE.Stand your ground! Do not concede to false authority. There is no authority outside of your self unless you believe in and consent to it.

We are not the servants or slaves of the parliaments and their laws. They are the public servants and representatives of the people elected to serve us. Hold them accountable.

We do not serve the law. The law serves us or it is a nullity and entitled to no obedience and respect.

The Federal Australian Constitution states: “… the truth is the supreme absolute and uncontrollable authority remains with the people.”(Preamble: p.286). We are supreme sovereign authority over our State and Federal Parliaments. The government/parliament has no sovereignty because it is an artificial entity/person; a legal fiction created by the supreme authority of the people! Never forget that.

QUESTIONS FOR AUTHORITIES AND BUREAUCRATS

The questions in this article are created as a relatively simple yet powerful means of challenging and defending one self against the assumptions, opinions, beliefs, demands and claims of all so-called “authority,” “officials,” “police,” “judges” and bureaucrats in general. These questions can be modified and adapted to almost any type of situation, event or circumstance involving interaction between human beings.

The questions are based on common sense, reason and the principle of placing the lawful burden of proof on any human who attempts to impose or force their conscience, will and beliefs against another human through allegations, assumptions, claims and demands without satisfactory factual proof.

A person does not need to be an expert in “law” to effectively use these questions. If we allow our selves to become entrapped and bogged down with “legal” gibberish and "semantic manipulation," then we become helplessly entangled in the political and legal systems’ games of control. The hidden self-appointed ruling elite primarily relies on the illusionary power of “political” and “legal” terminology and words to manipulate and control the thoughts, emotions and lives of humankind.

The majority of human beings are unaware that all so-called “statutes,” “Acts,” and “laws” are essentially the written subjective will and opinions and beliefs of certain humans known as “politicians” and “legislators (lawyers).” All human made “law” is fundamentally “contract law.” All human beings have an unlimited natural and common law right of free will choice to contract or not contract with anyone else.

All so-called “democratic” political and legal systems authority, power and jurisdiction relies entirely on the voluntary consent of the people – individually and collectively. Without consent or agreement there would be dictatorship, tyranny, oppression, subjugation, coercion, duress, extortion and blackmail to name a few. Naturally, all these acts are criminal offences.

I believe that demanding factual proof or "evidence in fact" through questions; asserting your sovereignty as a free will human being; claiming and living your unalienable natural/divine law, common law and constitutional rights, and challenging the presumed authority and jurisdiction of all courts and officials/bureaucrats over your life, liberty and property, are the simplest and most powerful tools of a free human being.

There is a legal maxim that states: "Affirmanti non neganti incumbit probatio... the burden of proof is upon him who affirms, not upon him who denies." And since it’s the fictitious, artificial entities and corporations of the “Commonwealth” and “States” making allegations, assumptions, claims and demands through their various police, authorities and bureaucrats, the burden of proof lies with them. 

These powerful questions can be asked or demanded of every judge, prosecutor, police officer, official and bureaucrat who attempts to impose their will, opinions/beliefs and “laws” over you:

Whatfacts (not opinions or beliefs) are currently within your knowledge that provewhere, when, why and how…or alternatively: what facts are there proving…

Your alleged, implied or presumed authority and jurisdiction over my life and human sovereignty without my consent/agreement? Are you claiming to be my creator, lord, master or owner?

You can take control (through coercion; force; violence) of my life, liberty or property against my free will and consent?  Are you responsible for my life? If no, then what right and proof do you have to interfere in my life/private affairs and decide what I can be, do and have without my consent?

You can impose (force) your conscience and will over me without my consent/agreement?

You can restrain or take away my unalienable natural law and human right to freedom of conscience and free will?

You can restrain or take away my unalienable natural law and human right to freedom of choice?

You can restrain or take away my unalienable natural law andhuman right to not consent (dissent) against any human laws that are deficient, repugnant to my conscience, or conflict with my natural law, common law or constitutional rights and liberties?

Any human law can bind, compel, coerce or obligate me against my conscience, free will and consent? Are you presuming I consented to the law in dispute and this law is applicable to me? If yes, can you factually prove it? (Note: quoting a law does not make it magically applicable and binding!)

You can restrain or take away my unalienable natural law, common law, constitutional and human rights of dissent,political sovereignty,political liberty,peaceful political protest, orconscientious objection against any deficient, repugnant, unjust or unconscionable human / political laws?

You can restrain, hinder, obstruct or take away my unalienable natural law, common law, constitutional, and human right of passage, right to travel and right to freedom of movement upon the earth? (This question is used in relation to common law vehicle registration, road tolls, parking tolls.)

Your allegation or claim I have committed a real crime when you lack standing and a valid cause of action? Standing requires “the allegation of a personal injury (resulting in harm, damage or loss) and a breach of duty (to a human being’s right to life, liberty or property). Who is the human victim in this alleged crime/offence? (Note: an artificial fictitious entity such as a “state,” “nation,” “corporation” or “Crown” cannot be a victim or injured!  They are ‘artificial persons’; not living sentient beings! )

Note: The U.S. Supreme Court has held that the “injury alleged must bedistinct and palpable, and not “abstract” or “conjectural” or “hypothetical,”… A plaintiff must allege personal injury fairly traceable to the defendant’s allegedly unlawful conduct and likely to be redressed by the requested relief.” Allen v. Wright, 468 U.S. 737, 751 (1984).

Use these questions with thoughtful diligence and you have practically cornered and checkmated all authority and bureaucrats. Most responses they give to these questions will be subjective opinions and beliefs - not objective facts.  Courts must only deal in objective facts and factual reality. Legal maxim: “All opinions and beliefs are subject to complete invalidation at law.”

Any accusations, allegations, assumptions, opinions and beliefs should be turned back onto the person asserting them in the form of the aforesaid questions, and always firmly demand strict factual proof or “evidence in fact.” Evidence consists of facts or the testimony of independent witnesses with personal knowledge of the facts.

Of course magistrates and judges have an insurmountable problem in that all “statutes,” “Acts” and laws are the written subjective will and opinions and beliefs of certain humans known as “politicians,” and “legislators” (lawyers). Additionally, any case law and precedents they refer to will also be nothing more than the subjective opinions and beliefs of other judges (lawyers) subjectively interpreting the written subjective opinions and beliefs known as statutes/acts/laws! 

The corporatised courts and human “magistrates” and “judges” acting within them knowingly conspire to keep this truth about “law” and human rights secretly hidden from the people, thus making many of them dishonorable and corrupt liars, frauds, impostors, charlatans and criminals. They often violate their own laws to protect the status quo and power of the current political and legal systems. 

Stand your ground with strength, courage, determination and the conviction of your beliefs and spirit. Magistrates and judges are often unable or unwilling to fairly deal with a human who knows who they truly are as a God created free sovereign human, and can confidently assert their rights and freedoms. On this basis I believe a person can more often than not successfully defend themselves against the political and legal systems, and live their unalienable rights as a free man and woman.

No human or political law can automatically bind or obligate anyone against their conscience, will and consent. Humans are not the servants or slaves of the government and its laws! The government and its laws are supposed to serve and protect our rights (life, liberty, property) and interests, or they are a nullity and entitled to no respect or obedience. Always remind your public servants of this truth.

I would like to give a special thank to my mate  jimmy “Copyright © Jim S., August 2007. All Rights Reserved” thanks.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.  - Thomas Jefferson